Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 48

Thread: Anyone on here got a nova low as this

  1. #21
    Senior User Club Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    South East London You Know :)
    Posts
    3,011
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Maybe people like rubbing noise

  2. #22
    Club Member Club Member bazil's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    renfrewshire
    Posts
    10,167
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BRoadGhost View Post
    Why is it pointless?
    Speedbumps, multi storey car parks, 3 point turn, carrying people in the back, getting stuff from B+Q

    So many cons,
    Pro's? You get " Yo bro your ride looks sick innit " compliments from the pond life at McD's car parks.
    success is only limited by a weak mind

  3. #23
    Senior User Club Member paul james's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    south wales
    Posts
    2,038
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Lowering a car to the point where its detrimental to handling on actual roads is the same kind of daft modification as tinting the windows so dark you can't see out of them properly, or having a stupidly massive big bore exhaust with multiple pipes on a 1.0, its all show and no go. I'd rather have a car that serves its purpose as an actual car, rather than an unuseable ornament. I've never understood this obsession people have that wheels must be hiding half way into the wheel arches, it just looks broken.

  4. #24
    Senior User mowgli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    somewhere in the 80's, hinckley
    Posts
    35,194
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    the red btcc car is from the days when they had a minimum ride height, and when they pulled into the puts after a session, the scrutineers would pull them in randomly to drive over a 3" block

    the later ones were from the era when money was god & they had to look like hotwheels toys, but they were certainly fast & spectaculer.


    the op pic is of a show car. it also has a welded chain steering wheel iirc, both are classic mexican lowrider mods, low & slow etc...

    unfortunately, there are lots of kids round here with really low cars on mega stiff springs, including the metrognomes, in their rover 100's with the fluid drained out, their heads bobbing up & down like a churchill rear shelf toy.. they are naturally declining, due to the large amounts of skid marks & floral tributes on roundabouts, these are the cars that suffer from terminal understeer(literally)

    i used to work with a hotrodder who had a 400hp yb powered hillman husky van. it was so low, it had small castor wheels mounted into its sills so it could clear obstacles.. it was also incredibly fast on decent open roads...

  5. #25
    Senior User Club Member Alex J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    hockley essex
    Posts
    6,463
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    that car looks ****

  6. #26
    Senior User
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    2,618
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The wheels at the front can have the arches over them because the geometry is such that to clear any corner on the circuit, that's all the room they need.

    Lowering ride height doesn't have to mean you can't get shopping in B&Q, clear a speedbump, use a multistory carpark or do a three point turn. TBH some people would be lucky to even have a passenger, let alone more than one, even if there were seats in the back.

    I don't think lowering a car that much is detrimental to it's handling or is just for show, in fact i'd say it's the opposite, providing it's done right.

    "I'd rather have a car that serves its purpose as an actual car, rather than an unuseable ornament." Amen ~ And that purpose would be to drive it. The way the arches look in relation to the wheel is just form following function; if it was a saloon you'd be able to see more of the wheel.

    Is a nova 3" from the ground too low then?

  7. #27
    Senior User
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Bridgwater
    Posts
    12,248
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    That nova looks utter crap

    The cav looks ok, but you know there for competition use

    Personally I prefer to actually have some suspension travel

  8. #28
    Go low or Go home. Moderator Benn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Fareham, Hampshire
    Posts
    23,816
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by turbojolt View Post
    I don't understand how the wheels even turn when there tucked that far inside the arches????? Clearly they do but I don't get it
    Rear end it tubbed, with a big air drop system in it. I did have pics in the boot, but i cant find them. The tubbs where bigger than the ones Simps had made. I didn't drive that low.

    Quote Originally Posted by bazil View Post
    Speedbumps, multi storey car parks, 3 point turn, carrying people in the back, getting stuff from B+Q

    So many cons,
    Pro's? You get " Yo bro your ride looks sick innit " compliments from the pond life at McD's car parks.
    It's a "show car" simple as that. It does drive that low, it doesn't go shopping, it doesn't carry people (when set that low) It's done for the low at a show, nothing else.

    I've set mine as low as i can go, but still drive able. I can go shopping in it, i've had 2 32"flat screen tvs in it, i've had 4 adults and KFC in it(rubbed a bit), i've had a xe engine block F20 and bits in the boot. And it's still drive able. Ok i cant go in a multi story car part in Scum as the ramps are very sharp so even with 2 people it the center box catches every ramp. And i don't have full lock on the steering but...

    If i wasn't gonna do any of that id go lower.
    All I wanted was a Pepsi, just one Pepsi
    Far from suicidal
    Still I get them tendencies
    Bringing back them memories
    That I really miss when I reminisce

  9. #29
    Senior User Club Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    South East London You Know :)
    Posts
    3,011
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    its just a good look to see a nova on the floor then a vw for once

  10. #30
    chippy shoulder Admin
    Join Date
    Nov 1999
    Location
    Crowland, The Dirty North
    Posts
    35,414
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BRoadGhost View Post


    I don't think lowering a car that much is detrimental to it's handling or is just for show, in fact i'd say it's the opposite, providing it's done right.
    There lies the issue.....
    Most will just slam the crap out of a car with the cheapest nastiest coil overs they can and then not fix the issues such as geometry, driveshaft angles, steering arm angles and so on. That's where the claims of it won't handle right come from.
    Bit like folks bitching about carbs always going out of tune, when in reality it's just badly setup in the first place.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •