View Full Version : is there a difference between mk1+mk2 rear quarters
Scooby_Eater
15-10-09, 12:33 AM
as above :thumb:
thanks
orangenovaredtop
15-10-09, 12:47 AM
same shells pal
Scooby_Eater
15-10-09, 12:53 AM
that were fast you 2 cheers :thumb:
+1
i thought it was decided that mk2s had slightly wider rear arches
Scooby_Eater
15-10-09, 02:17 AM
i thought it was decided that mk2s had slightly wider rear arches
where was this decided? ive had a good look around
decided on here the hundreds of other times this question has been asked
Scooby_Eater
15-10-09, 02:29 AM
decided on here the hundreds of other times this question has been asked
ok matey cheers,ive had a search on here but couldnt find anything.Maybe someone will come along in morning + give a few more opinions
Novaboi_1991
15-10-09, 03:17 AM
ive had mk1s an mk2s never thought there was a difference :confused:
altho it is agree'd each shell has slight differences on the rear arches, give or take a few mm when you come to fitting wheels, other thn that i think theyre the same...
timbo1980
15-10-09, 03:51 AM
the diffrence is where the rear bumper mounts,if fitting mk1's on a mk2 remember to weld up the holes for mk1 bumper bracket
GRUNT 16V
15-10-09, 10:39 AM
bang on timbo !!!!!!!!! they are different !! as the mk1/mk2 bumpers have different fittings
What i was just about to say^
The archs are slighty wider it seems, but not enough to matter.
I know that my wheels clear fine on my mk2 but rub on my mates mk1.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.