Page 87 of 211 FirstFirst ... 3777858687888997137187 ... LastLast
Results 861 to 870 of 2103

Thread: House's ITB XE build and re-build

  1. #861
    Club Member turbojolt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    derbyshire, derby, shelton lock
    Posts
    10,358
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Nice so the red one is now the R&D car
    ^^^ did you just read that? what a idiot ^^^


    PROJECT 2 FAST 2 FAT clicky


    ''lifes what happens, while your busy making plans''

  2. #862
    Senior User
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Kings Hill, Kent
    Posts
    1,889
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Thanks Craig and Andy, maybe I was a bit harsh but just because we talk over a keyboard doesn't mean we can dispense with politeness and respect and if someone wants us to listen to what they say about our projects, maybe they need to get their own one up so we can make comments about thiers!! I could type a massive long list of exactly how a car should be built, doesn't mean I can do it though does it!!!!!

    TJ, yep red one is an R&D car, we know the tank is going back to standard position, and we've got a good idea on suspension setup now, so always learning!!
    Last edited by House; 09-09-16 at 05:42 PM.

  3. #863
    Go low or Go home. Moderator Benn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Fareham, Hampshire
    Posts
    23,813
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Cheers for the message over the mounts.
    All I wanted was a Pepsi, just one Pepsi
    Far from suicidal
    Still I get them tendencies
    Bringing back them memories
    That I really miss when I reminisce

  4. #864
    Senior User
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    2,618
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Not sure it's a troll; just trying to help with another build based on the experiences with my beam. I found that the mount points not only take extra stress on the chassis legs but the holes themselves due to the extra weight.

  5. #865
    Senior User
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Kings Hill, Kent
    Posts
    1,889
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BRoadGhost View Post
    Not sure it's a troll; just trying to help with another build based on the experiences with my beam. I found that the mount points not only take extra stress on the chassis legs but the holes themselves due to the extra weight.
    So some machined spacers welded on the outside of the holes? Maybe 3mm thick to beef that up? And I already have the Hockly rear beam mounts on this shell and will ofcourse have them on the new one.

  6. #866
    Senior User
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    West Yorkshire lad
    Posts
    22,243
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Still enjoying this thread, car look brilliant

    i hate hate typing as it never comes out as you mean, when I'm talking in person I can't shut up

  7. #867
    Senior User
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Kings Hill, Kent
    Posts
    1,889
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Southie View Post
    Still enjoying this thread, car look brilliant

    i hate hate typing as it never comes out as you mean, when I'm talking in person I can't shut up
    Ah Mr South!! Always love your litte posts of encouragement

  8. #868
    Senior User
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    West Yorkshire lad
    Posts
    22,243
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    No worries if somethings worth reading then it's worth a compliment.

  9. #869
    Club Member Club Member TallDave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Southampton
    Posts
    132
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by House View Post
    TJ, yep red one is an R&D car, we know the tank is going back to standard position, and we've got a good idea on suspension setup now, so always learning!!
    Ah Mr House, nice to see you've calmed down a bit...

    And finally someone has come to realise that sticking the fuel tank in the spare wheel well isn't necessarily all its cracked up to be, especially if you have to carry more than 5 litres or so (i.e. doing something other than a sprint or hill climb). Personally I've failed to see why you would move it from a point low down and between the wheels, a place that does its best to lower the CoG and reduce the polar moments (the thing that make a car easier to spin) of the car. Yes its a pain to add a tank gaurd for rallying purposes, but surely that what kevlar was invented for
    I love a good build thread, so heaven knows why I'm here...

    My C20XE Rally Car Build

  10. #870
    Senior User
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Kings Hill, Kent
    Posts
    1,889
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I'm calm as a coma Mr TD!!!

    I originally moved the tank to experiment with fueling issues, I was struggling with fuel starvation out of roundabouts, at the time of installing the tank there I had no intention of using the car on track or even using it in real anger, so the dynamics of having it in the boot weren't an issue. I was also looking for a way of removing the lift pump as, at the time, we thought I was suffering from fuel cavitation caused by the lift pump. A gravity fed swirl pot from a tank mounted high up made sense.

    However, after discussions with Tim at the Phirm he's come up with an inline swirl pot that will allow us to go back to the original tank location and also run the lines externally aswell, all a learning process. As you correctly say the lower and closer to the middle of the car we can get the weight the less effect it will have on handling.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •