Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 51

Thread: good bye paintball

  1. #41
    Senior User
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Somewhere under the bonnet. Drives: Mark 4 Astra GSi turbo. Builds: Nothing yet.
    Posts
    2,974
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mike View Post
    I think youve completely failed to read the OP contents....

    ANYTHING OVER 370fps will allegedly be deemed "illegal" unless youve got a license to own such firearms. If your job relys on such equipment & you can prove it etc then being granted a section 5 firearms license shouldnt be an issue at all.

    BUT, the original info is neither here nor there anyway, as theres been talk of it for over ten years now & nothings changed at all.
    [sarcasm]Effectively then t'is all interwebz facts and totally troofs.[/sarcasm]

    Those who own air rifles etc will be fine for now then...

  2. #42
    Junior User
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    murder capital of the midlands lol
    Posts
    76
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    as far as i know you cant be granted a section 5 unles you are a dealer in fire arms, i know when they bought in the laws about brococks that you could keep them on your fac, but others could not handle/shoot them and if you want to despose of them you have to hand them in to the police!
    i asked our fac officer and he knows nothing of this at the moment.

    there are white papers coming out every week, lucky this government dont wanna ban everything.


    on a diffrent note is there a part of this forum to introduce yourself

  3. #43
    Senior User Mike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    26,594
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ratboy View Post
    i asked our fac officer and he knows nothing of this at the moment.
    Proof is in the pudding so they say.

    If, IF anything under 370fps became illegal, that would deem nearly every single paintball gun, air rifle, gas powered bb gun etc an hactual illegal firearm. Now, lets say a modest 5% of the UK's 61.8m people own such device.. thats a shade over 3m weapons goin go one each! For starters Ive got 3, my brother has 4 paintball markers, mate of mine has 2 etc etc blah blah yadda yadda.

    How anyone is going to collate, catalouge & then bring to justice that amount of people is beyond me.

    Ergo, a bit of initiative cries a mass amount of bs of any such law.

  4. #44
    User Jackroadkill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Newtown, Powys, Wales
    Posts
    433
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mike View Post
    I think youve completely failed to read the OP contents....

    ANYTHING OVER 370fps will allegedly be deemed "illegal" unless youve got a license to own such firearms. If your job relys on such equipment & you can prove it etc then being granted a section 5 firearms license shouldnt be an issue at all.

    BUT, the original info is neither here nor there anyway, as theres been talk of it for over ten years now & nothings changed at all.
    No, haven't failed to read it. The thing is, you don't just get a license to own firearms of one particular section or another; rather you get "slots" that are specific to one gun - as in my FAC states that I can own a single .22lr rifle, a single .17hmr rifle, a single. 22 FAC air rife (over 12 fpe) and moderators for all three. A shotgun certificate, however, grants you the permission to own as many shotguns of any calibre as you can physically ram into a cabinet (provided that they are'nt Section 1 or 5 firearms as defined by law).

    What concerns me is that I would have to add ( at a cost, I might add) three additional slots for my air rifles and pistol, and a further two for the moderators for the rifles if this happened. I don't want to be forced into having more guns on my ticket than I have to because of a small element of society who are nothing to do with me or with legal shooting in general, which is what is being inferred in the OP - hence my comment about the law-abiding shooter suffering as a result of a few idiots.

    As such, the vast majority of people who currently own and shoot an airgun have no license, because one is not needed; if they all had to apply retrospectively for an FAC there would be a huge pressure placed on an already overburdened firearms licensing system.

  5. #45
    Junior User
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    murder capital of the midlands lol
    Posts
    76
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    the law-abiding shooter suffering as a result of a few idiots.

    yep agree with that.

  6. #46
    User bai1ey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    lincolnshire
    Posts
    1,402
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jackroadkill View Post
    As such, the vast majority of people who currently own and shoot an airgun have no license, because one is not needed; if they all had to apply retrospectively for an FAC there would be a huge pressure placed on an already overburdened firearms licensing system.
    this man talks sense

  7. #47
    Senior User
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Somewhere under the bonnet. Drives: Mark 4 Astra GSi turbo. Builds: Nothing yet.
    Posts
    2,974
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mike View Post
    initiative
    + Government = Myth

    Quote Originally Posted by Jackroadkill View Post
    As such, the vast majority of people who currently own and shoot an airgun have no license, because one is not needed; if they all had to apply retrospectively for an FAC there would be a huge pressure placed on an already overburdened firearms licensing system.
    Sense at last.

  8. #48
    User Jackroadkill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Newtown, Powys, Wales
    Posts
    433
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bai1ey View Post
    this man talks sense
    Quote Originally Posted by TeddyThom View Post
    Sense at last.
    Thanks lads.

  9. #49
    Senior User NovaLad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Oldham - Land of the Pie Heads!
    Posts
    8,138
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Don't know if it's been mentioned but basicly the bread and butter of firearms is that it includes anything from the following... LETHAL, BARRELLED, WEAPON... This is of any discription from which any shot, bullet or missile can be discharged.

    So really it covers everything .

    It's pretty much down to the discretion of an officer either reg or firearms trained to choose if it needs seizing.


    EDIT -
    Oh and it comes under Section 16a of the Firearms Act if you use any of the above to cause fear or violence to another person.

    Can you imagine all the kids that could be locked up right now .
    Last edited by NovaLad; 10-11-11 at 04:52 PM.

  10. #50
    Senior User
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Austin, Tx, Usa
    Posts
    24,200
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    i wonder how fast i can fire the wrapper off a maccys straw

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •