Cool just let me know when yours gets done lolQuote:
Originally Posted by t45_ste
Printable View
Cool just let me know when yours gets done lolQuote:
Originally Posted by t45_ste
Furry muff, I thought you were planning on going crazy low. I know I'm sounding really negative but..... is the extra shock travel even needed on a track car? I've never had a problem with bottoming out, running normal lowered height (70ish mm??)Quote:
Originally Posted by Count Vaux Alot
lol ******* :cry:Quote:
Originally Posted by Count Vaux Alot
Great things come to those that wait...................
No probably not but why not if you can?Quote:
Originally Posted by dhdev (Oli)
I'm going on my experiences with the saloon and the way the ride/handling is when its low (not silly low 70-90mm) and imo its w@nk so i want the option of running full travel (as even a 70mm drop compresses the shocks) and being able to drop it down too, so i thought funk it i'll give it a go.
And yer you are being very negative lol
TBH biggest issue running urba low on a nova is not suspension angles its necking out the CV joints.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v4...ffoldpc153.jpg
That was my nova on its ledas running the highest possible i could run.
O and it still had a ruck load of travel to go.
WEIGHT :pQuote:
Originally Posted by Count Vaux Alot
Fair play for trying something new, the proof will be in the puddin as they say :)
I wuv you and your car :D (is that more positive lol)
love the way Oli is being negative because its something his car doesn't have lol
brill work James, proper bo, glad it worked out as we planned it
regardless of 'needing' the shock travel Oli, the more you have, the better it is, you can't argue with that.
That's because its heavy :pQuote:
Originally Posted by trackdaynova
Rick - James won't have to worry about shaft plunge angle either, from what we're working on ;)
Christ the front turrets look... Well crazy. Love the fab work, would rep you if i could.
Are they still under the height of the wings?