Printable View
you'll never forget the first time you get a mk2 sideways on tarmac........ i just wish the one my missus bought for £30 wasn't so rotten it could have been a vauxhall....... it only got one proper good blast down the rd......... to the breakers yard. 20 miles of who cares sort of driving.....
its the only car i ever drove on the road where i was looking forward thru the rear passenger window.....and still held onto it & got it straight..
i had nowhere to store it, or it would have been a seven
ST170 is the 2 litre turbo?
Looks a real beaut.
Sadly I'd like the jap crap it's parked next to.........
Isnt the st a 2.5 na?
lol
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy_L
2.0 litre n/a iirc, its 170bhp, i know theyre slow as ive killed them in lesser cars lol
yep spud there 2.0 litre n/a with 170 bhp there was mk2 on a ramp where gareth_c got his first map done . i ask what was in it and it was st 10 and defo didn't have a turbo hanging of it
2L n/a but as said this one has TB's and management hence 187bhp.Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy_L
why? skylines are ****
Possibly the worst statement you have ever made.Quote:
Originally Posted by burgo
heavy jap crapQuote:
Originally Posted by Paul
1.4t isnt exactly heavy? R33-GTR will still do 1/4mile in standard form 12.8secs.
Engine was designed for 500bhp, so is supe reliable, transmission systems are quality, drive very nicely. Dont exactly look ugly.
Near 50/50 weight distribution.
Fail to see in any way, shape or form how heyre crap?
its facking heavy enough and according to the owner of this r33 although the internals can cope with lots of power things like clutch and coil packs dont like anything above standard powerQuote:
Originally Posted by Paul