View Full Version : stuart
JSeymour
06-06-07, 11:05 AM
ive just had an epilectic fit!:tard:
^^ PMSL
another fact that this country can **** anything up
pfffft cant see how my gif can cause a fit. its not the offical video lmao.
if it dosent cause an epileptic fit, it causes vomiting.
Full blown video is worse IMO
Sounds bad, but the logo jittering away just makes me think "parkinsons disease" :wtf:
Wasn't it done by the guy that rehashed the BT logo a few years back (not the OpenWorld one, the trumpeting bloke)? Who ripped them off as well iirc...
wisewood
06-06-07, 12:31 PM
i dont even see this new thing as a logo - certainly not one suitable for the olympics. something sleek and smooth like the olympic rings would be way better.
the logo that spells LONDON out in modifications of the rings in the right colours was really sleak and classy, but oh no we cant ahve that. we must all try to look arty and on the bleeding edge of culture lmao..... nice try lads.
JSeymour
06-06-07, 12:40 PM
it looks like something straght out of czechozovlacia(sp).....80's style. lmao
wisewood
06-06-07, 01:18 PM
reminds me a lot of this
http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/42348000/jpg/_42348232_tiswas_203.jpg
I prefered the old one. I'm all for "modernisation" but it makes the Brits look a bit ghey tbh. lol
I fear it may be a cunning ploy on the part of the UK to disable other nation's athletes by inducing epileptic fits (http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/06/06/olympic_footage_scare/)
its ridiculous some substantial amount of money has been paid for this "ART" why not let a kid design it they may of done a better job.
Its not surprising its sh1t.
Sebastian Co designed it. Hes a runner, not an artist lol
Seb Coe didn't design it, but he did Ok it... freakin' weirdo that he is
wisewood
07-06-07, 04:32 PM
I dont think any monies have actually changed hands for this yet. Ken Livingstone was interviewed last night and really let rip about it.
I cant remember now if the fee was ?400,000 or ?800,000. Whichever it is, it's not worth anything like that amount for the product they've been given.
The logo is supposed to enhance the image of the brand, or portray the brand in the best way possible. This utter sh*te they have come up with is just having the opposite effect and has everyone talking about the London 2012 games for all the wrong reasons.
BigStan
07-06-07, 09:04 PM
I think it looks whack !!!
JSeymour
07-06-07, 11:18 PM
its ?400,000!! what a total waste of money. these people dont live in the real world.
just watching news night and it came to convo, they said itl be more worth while keeping it as its better then paying someone another 400k to inprove it.
id do it for ?100, good for one days work sitting on my ass. grrr
Philsutton
07-06-07, 11:45 PM
more evidence that this country sucks at everything
novabex
08-06-07, 11:41 AM
Its crap.
Do like the pinkness though. Haha.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.