PDA

View Full Version : 2.0l 16v turbo or 2.5 v6



nova-boy-belfast
10-03-07, 10:25 PM
well wat you guys think is better an wat would improve most after mods.
i already have a 2L 8v fitted from a cav, wat would you guys suggest. thanks

lee coley
10-03-07, 10:29 PM
turbo all day long.v6 to big and less power and heavy

novanutted
11-03-07, 02:26 AM
turbo

F188CHG
11-03-07, 02:48 AM
silly question if your looking for the better performance!

RJM25R
11-03-07, 11:25 AM
v6 aren't that quick and handle even worse.
No offence, but if you have enough knowledge/skill to build a turbo OR a v6, you should have enough knowledge to not be asking a forum for advice.....

nova-boy-belfast
11-03-07, 12:17 PM
well was just wonderin as you can always stick a turbo onto the v6 although there aint really gonna be alot of space i know but it can be done so you guys think stick to the turbo then

lee coley
11-03-07, 12:21 PM
no we are just saying it 4 laugh. he he

Mazz
11-03-07, 12:53 PM
Depends if you want reliability or performance?

Philsutton
11-03-07, 04:24 PM
turbo all day long

rc
11-03-07, 04:37 PM
yep love the c20let

Jack
11-03-07, 09:23 PM
well was just wonderin as you can always stick a turbo onto the v6 although there aint really gonna be alot of space i know but it can be done so you guys think stick to the turbo then
Supercharger would be more interesting on the V6 IMO, although I doubt there'd be any room in the Nova bay for it. The V6 would also sound nicer, be a little different, and consdierably cheaper - I've seen V6's go on ebay for <?100 where as LET's usually seem to go for >?1000

If it were me though, I'd go for the LET - tried and tested.