have a think about this

[General Baxter]

http://www.freedomunderground.org/memoryhole/pentagon.php#Main

[Dpnova]

quite intresting...but you have to belive what there saying. pictures could all be shopped

[jon_boy]

the body went through and punched the "neat holes" and the wings shattered into a million peices and then got burned by the 5700 gallons of fuel. maybe. dont beleive in conspiracy theories. if someone had missiled america bush would love it cos then he has a good excuse to go nuke people.

[General Baxter]

but what about the 'crosswinds' from the engine as it went over the 'highway'

anybody remember that test they did on top gear with cross winds they used a 747 jet engine on full power and pulled cars across it?

they cars took off and got blown to bits

:wink: :twisted:

[General Baxter]

quite intresting...but you have to belive what there saying. pictures could all be shopped

pictures are not shopped as there was a doc on one of them sky channel (so many can not remember) but i do remember there the same photos

[jon_boy]

there may not have been a wind on the motorway if the plane was heading floorwards as the engines would be facing skywards, and the majority of the thrust going up. they didnt bring it down nice n smooth n flat it would have been straight down aimed at the centre so at no point would the engines thrust go along the ground across a motorway. maybe.

[Chris]

there may not have been a wind on the motorway if the plane was heading floorwards as the engines would be facing skywards, and the majority of the thrust going up. they didnt bring it down nice n smooth n flat it would have been straight down aimed at the centre so at no point would the engines thrust go along the ground across a motorway. maybe.

I totally disagree with you here. I dont know why you think that the thrust from the aircaft would be pointing 'skywards'. The thrust from an aircraft doesnt change direction (apart from braking, when it is reversed). The thrust is used to propell the aircraft along, the shape of the wings in conjunction with flaps causes the lift. Although dependant on the path of the aircraft it might have been too high to blow cars off the motorway, as someone described it coming in to land on an imaginary runway. An aircraft of that type would come in at 3 degrees, so the is a good possibility that it would have been too high to 'blow' cars off the motorway. I think the boeing story is false. What I think happened was they (FBI, US Military? whoever?) made a massive security mistake and used a boeing story to cover it up. Something else went wrong that day in a desert when locals heard 2 sonic booms (can only be from fighter jets or concorde???) and then later another passenger liner 'crashed'. That was all covered up. Just something for you all to think about.......

[scott.parker]

easy bush wanted to get rid of sadam cus his dad faild to,so he whent iun to finish the job,and they wer trying to gain oil,what better way to do this then send a missle into the petogon and two planes sent to make impact with the trade towers by a fly by wire system,thats the theorie that i saw on chanle five a while back,and i dont care what you say i think there onto something,as most of the ppl who wer ment to have been on the planes highjaking them and died on them are still alive as they found them.. and they also say how they found the highjakers passport just minutes affter the building colapsed,HOW can that servive the fire and fall on top of all the ruble etc,when everything els was destroyed????

think about that... i will say im sure it loks like something that the us and fbi have made look like a teerorists atack....

scott

[jon_boy]

I know planes normally fly at 3 degrees when coming down etc, but if your coming down with no intention of making a safe landing then you would just nose dive. and the propulsion from the jet engine does change direction ie on take off when you pull up, the body of the plane and therefore the engine etc all face up and the thrust down. Conspiracy theories are always "proveable" but there are many people more clever than us that can also dis prove them more believably.

[jon_boy]

Oh, loads of americans beleive to have been abducted by aliens and %40 of the nation beleive they will see teh ressurection of Christ in their lifetime. In which case half the eyewitness accounts, at least, are questionable at best. In my eyes at least. not saying it isnt true, just saying its very unlikely..

[Riggy]

quite interesting that :D

[Chris]

easy bush wanted to get rid of sadam cus his dad faild to,so he whent iun to finish the job,and they wer trying to gain oil,what better way to do this then send a missle into the petogon and two planes sent to make impact with the trade towers by a fly by wire system,
scott

The war in Iraq was nothing to do with the twin towers or the 'pentagon conspiracy'. Saddam had pushed his luck for so many years, he 'had' to be removed. The WMD was an excuse to go in and do 'the business' as it is illegal to go to war to remove a regime.

Chris

[MattNova]

worth taking 5mins from work to see. bit skeptical but probs true

[Chris]

Some very interesting reading can be found here:
http://www.novaload.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=92903&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0