View Full Version : Nova rivals in 1984
Interesting to see what was about if you were interested in buying a new car in 1984:
http://www.hondajazz1984.de/autocar26051984.htm
Nova's at the bottom as a rival for the Honda Jazz. Was the 0-60 of a 1L really 18 seconds?!
lol in 84 they already knew it
Heating, ventilation and finish are only average and the ride is poor. It is competitively priced.
peester
18-09-10, 05:55 PM
stood test of time better than the others tho; thanks to rally/competition pedigree..?
paul james
18-09-10, 06:17 PM
Like the article says, the nova is a good all round car, that doesn't really do anything massively different. Which isn't a bad thing is it. Its not complicated, so easy and cheap to fix. The styling wasn't too flashy, so it didn't look out of date quickly.
Time is a good test of true quality, and its the Nova out of that bunch that is the most popular still now. If you could travel back in time and buy one of those cars new, it certainly wouldn't be the metro!
i'm guessing the autocar journalist didn't get a roll of tenners in the glove boot when he tested the nova.... there is no way on this earth that the 1.0 metro is in any way better than the 1.0 nova... and that honda thing is just plain awful
though the gearchange is one of Fiat's better efforts it is still not a strong point
My Fiat Uno gearchange was like stirring a wooden spoon in Stuart's bumhole lol
Hmm, out of that the Nova comes across as "average". As for it standing the test of time, there's more early-80's Charades and Metros round here than there is Novas.
according to the 1992 brochure max speed was 89, and 0-60 19.5 sec
taffnova
18-09-10, 09:11 PM
i wernt even born then lol
i wernt even born then lol
I weren't even in Bag'Dad
i wernt even born then lol
i was 16 & driving tractors about in 84.
dj_wudgey
18-09-10, 10:41 PM
i'm guessing the autocar journalist didn't get a roll of tenners in the glove boot when he tested the nova.... there is no way on this earth that the 1.0 metro is in any way better than the 1.0 nova... and that honda thing is just plain awful
i agree mate the nova is well beter than both off them in all catagories and looks well the nova beats them all hands down!!!
scott.parker
18-09-10, 10:47 PM
BUT only the nova still looks remotely attractive in standard form out of all of the cars! lol
agreed....which was the biggest seller?
Mint FRST
18-09-10, 10:49 PM
I weren't even in Bag'Dad
Love it!
Angus Closier
18-09-10, 10:52 PM
To be honest im sure all our views are very differant about the ones that look best etc, On the metro forums and the likes they probs all love the look of them!! Ahhh the nova is just a sh*tbox but its fun!!
Nova's look the best standard, followed by the Dirty 'Tro I saw one for sale at the scrappy today, C reg 1 lady owner blah blah, Yellow it was pretty nice
dj_wudgey
18-09-10, 11:03 PM
Nova's look the best standard, followed by the Dirty 'Tro I saw one for sale at the scrappy today, C reg 1 lady owner blah blah, Yellow it was pretty nice
the nova's easily look the best then i agree the metro is the next best allthough if it was a uno turbo i may be forced into saying thats 2nd best looking lol!!
Uno turbo for me as well
Fook me tho if you think nova's rust bad them Uno's are waaay worse, mums friend had one when I was young and it had rotted after a few years from new, fooking great hole in the floor lol
dj_wudgey
18-09-10, 11:09 PM
yea i know they rot well bad a mate had one years back they do look cool though!!
When I bought my nova from archie I drove it from ayr to mine 100+miles and it was a 1.0
never again lol once I got to 60 I got scared to go any faster lol (that's if it would)
swedge, it must have been a wreck then..
mine was a 1.0 & it was surprisingly nippy when i drove it home. it is better with 1.6 though
Lol it wasn't a wreck just didn't feel safe in it at 60 lol
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.