PDA

View Full Version : why is a 1.0 dearer to insure than a 1.2


bigdan1
13-07-10, 05:45 PM
its really buggin me i just got a quote for a 1.2 and it was £297 and i just put in my 1.0 and its £700? wtf lol

i can insure an mr2 2.0 16v for 400 lmfao

anyone know any good insurers gocompare just aint cutting it
Jack
13-07-10, 05:47 PM
Claim rate perhaps.
craig green
13-07-10, 05:49 PM
More 1.0L's go through ditches, hedges & garden walls I guess.

OHV FTL.
paul james
13-07-10, 05:56 PM
or perhaps so many 2.0 not declared in 1.0 novas
craig green
13-07-10, 05:57 PM
Valid point. :roll:
Dan
15-07-10, 08:06 PM
*crap removed, keep it to pm ladies please*
saloonwoody
15-07-10, 10:08 PM
cos 1.0's are driven by hero's and **** get's fcuked up lol
Gibbo
16-07-10, 04:21 PM
my 1.0l is 1500 a year
wwmnw
16-07-10, 08:52 PM
my 1.0l is 1500 a year

Holy ****ing ****, my 1.2 was 750 for my first year!
MattBrown
17-07-10, 12:02 AM
My 1.0 was £1502 a year, fully comp lol
brainsnova
17-07-10, 12:18 AM
they know if your in a 1L then your going to have your foot to the floor all the time lol
stupot89
17-07-10, 12:47 AM
its tto stop people buying them because threr s**t lol
hc coupe
17-07-10, 12:57 AM
Because their lying, thieving b*****s that make it up as they go along,

Form my experience at least
mowgli
17-07-10, 09:56 AM
the arcane workings of the insurance industry could fill the whole of the internet...... basically, loads of young lads buy 1.0 novas, and either crash them, or stick large undeclared engines in them & then crash them.... also loads of 1.0 novas have survived because it was the coffin dodgers cheap car so they don't get trashed, but have loads of low speed car park crashes, which also puts the premium up.....

whereas everyone knows the 1.2 is so nippy, that it keeps out of trouble.