side repeaters or no side repeaters?

[buzbi]

as i have to blank the aerial hole on the O/S wing i was thinking about blanking the side repeaters at the same, just wanted some opinions really, the car was made in 1986 so i'll be able to blag it if i need to at MOT time (and i have a frienly tester:D )

http://photos-a.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc1/hs010.snc1/2891_76601937709_682607709_1596552_614747_n.jpg

[Graeme]

Definately without imo

[AlexW]

Id say with, clears tho!

I think without looks boring.

Oh and those wings have had a lot of owners!

[buzbi]

Oh and those wings have had a lot of owners!

sometimes its nice to have a get around (or two as it would be:D ) but mine still manages to touch the sides lol lol

[Novaboi_1991]

Id say with, clears tho!

I think without looks boring.

Oh and those wings have had a lot of owners!

Agree'd

[twin40s]

When you have no repeater how to you stop the other lights flashing to fast prob a stupid qs.

[Jack]

Side repeater shouldn't make it flash fast.

If it does, just stick a resistor in OR keep the bulb but hide it somewhere

[Edd]

Without on a mk 1, looks smoother. With on mk 2 IMO.

[mayhem]

without.

[J40NOV]

I def would keep the side repeaters, keep it legal imo the fuzz will not br on your side lol

[Royston]

I prefer without, but they are a legal requirement for cars registered after 1st of August '86 iirc ,could always stick some on the mirrors!