View Full Version : chargecooler vs intercooler
nova_stee
13-04-09, 05:54 PM
what would people say was best iam wanting to run phase 3 eds and a 3inch exhaust and f28
George g
13-04-09, 06:36 PM
i have always known IC's to be better, but take up a fair whack of space, however a charge cooler can be used if the space is limited(such as CVH turbo's in KA's). ALL higher power engines i have come across use IC's and the lower power ones sometimes use charge coolers... dont know there limits though.
see sig link for a nice little document/article about the differences...(if it dosent work give me a shout)
I love the concept of a CC purely because of the epic things you can do like put ice/dry ice in the header tank to get the water exceptionaly cold and so on lol
but for VFM an Intercooler wins 99% of the time :(
George g
15-04-09, 10:19 AM
see sig link for a nice little document/article about the differences...(if it dosent work give me a shout)
I love the concept of a CC purely because of the epic things you can do like put ice/dry ice in the header tank to get the water exceptionaly cold and so on lol
Dry ice in water? Are you nuts?
He plays with missiles all day, wtf you think? lol
In a nutshell...
Chargecooler is more efficient, and can fit in a smaller space. Also suffers much less lag than an intercooler.
Intercooler is cheaper, simpler, and easier to install. Also don't need a pump, but thats no big deal and shouldn't make a noticeable difference on power.
One of the reasons the Celica RC has more power than a std 185 is due to the RC's WTA chargecooler instead of the ATA intercooler on 185s.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.