PDA

View Full Version : piston machining



turbojolt
20-07-08, 11:06 AM
how much roughly will it cost to get 4 1.2 pistons pocketed

Adam
20-07-08, 12:15 PM
£50-£60

But why?

turbojolt
20-07-08, 12:33 PM
i was told is i want to put the 1.3 sr crank shaft and rods on my 1.2 i will need to have them pocketed

burgo
20-07-08, 12:47 PM
all depends on your local engineering shop. only way to find out is to ask. im sure paid £60 tho

ck
20-07-08, 04:47 PM
who told u this? im not sure myself but the piston does not protrude past the block on both engines, and providing it still doesnt then why would you need to pocket the pistons? ive never heard of them being pocketed for very lairy cams...

turbojolt
20-07-08, 04:51 PM
mowgli said when he had a 1.3 and bored the block to accept the 1.2 pistons he had to have them pocketed

will i not need to do this if i start with the 1.2 block

burgo
21-07-08, 02:00 AM
turbojolt the only way of knowing is measuring and dummy building. just because on has to doesnt mean the other does

mowgli
21-07-08, 08:38 AM
turbojolt.

re-read my original answer., you have to measure everything & be a competent mathematician to do the sums to get the pocket right.
my intention was to get a reasonable compression ratio so I could run reliably on unleaded.

the original PMC 1.4 conversion, which was my inspiration, actually came with pocketed pistons. if left at the stock shape, you had something like 11.75:1 cr

turbojolt
21-07-08, 08:07 PM
turbojolt.

re-read my original answer., you have to measure everything & be a competent mathematician to do the sums to get the pocket right.
my intention was to get a reasonable compression ratio so I could run reliably on unleaded.

the original PMC 1.4 conversion, which was my inspiration, actually came with pocketed pistons. if left at the stock shape, you had something like 11.75:1 cr

with that kind of compersion would i have to run it on super unleaded

matthew172
21-07-08, 08:53 PM
when he had a 1.3 and bored the block to accept the 1.2 pistons

wtf?? sureley if it was a 1.3 then the pistons would be bigger than 1.2 items anyway so therefore no need to bore the 1.3 block if theres nothing bigger to be put in place

turbojolt
21-07-08, 08:54 PM
nope the 1.2 pistons are bigger

mowgli
21-07-08, 10:09 PM
the 1.2 is big bore short stroke.
the 1.3 is small bore big stroke.
mix them up & you get a 1.4 that an f10 gearbox will fit to & has a small engine number......

burgo
22-07-08, 02:25 AM
wtf?? sureley if it was a 1.3 then the pistons would be bigger than 1.2 items anyway so therefore no need to bore the 1.3 block if theres nothing bigger to be put in placeneeds to read up on how engine displacement is worked out