Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: power curve of 8v and 16v

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Canvey, Essex
    Posts
    27
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default power curve of 8v and 16v

    Would anyone explain to me the differences in the power delivery curve of a 8v motor to 16v, cheers.

  2. #2
    Porridge boy
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    linlithgow (scotland)
    Posts
    1,794
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    What engine mate?? 1400, 1600, 1800, 2000?? the list goes on!!

    Bruce

  3. #3
    chippy shoulder Admin
    Join Date
    Nov 1999
    Location
    Crowland, The Dirty North
    Posts
    35,414
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    he wants 2 litre...


    dont bother "explaining" jsut get some graphs up

  4. #4
    Porridge boy
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    linlithgow (scotland)
    Posts
    1,794
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stuart
    he wants 2 litre...
    Thought he might !! I dont have any power graphs of the std engines!! Im sure the 8v will give a flater graph with more power low down revs!! And the 16v more up the high end of the revs, as most 16v's do!!

    Bruce

  5. #5
    Performance 106 Group MyNovaSr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Leicestershire
    Posts
    1,151
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Not a massive difference, the 16v is slightly more responsive.

  6. #6
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Canvey, Essex
    Posts
    27
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    To be honest i wasnt sure that size had an affect too, i had come to the conclusion that 8v had more torque lower down the range but lost revs quickly, where as 16v had most of its power higher up and reved higher. I dont know why but this is what i had guessed. Am i any where being right?

    I am actually more interested in the smaller engines, 1.2 1.3 1.4

  7. #7
    chippy shoulder Admin
    Join Date
    Nov 1999
    Location
    Crowland, The Dirty North
    Posts
    35,414
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    your more or less right in your thoughts.

    actually, as far as your concerned your right :D

  8. #8
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Canvey, Essex
    Posts
    27
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Cheers.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •