Page 3 of 9 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 83

Thread: 1.2 head on 1.3 block?

  1. #21
    User
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    593
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    would it not be more benificial to keep the higher compression?
    it seems like you guys know what your talking about though.
    ive just bult a 1.6se block with a 1.4se head on, the compression is immense, goes well with carbs on though!

  2. #22
    Senior User Club Member Novasport's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Derby, Derbyshire. Drives: Nova Sport, BMW M3, Nova Swing, Peugeot 208
    Posts
    9,086
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I think the machining is more to do with piston to valve clearance to prvent the pistons smashing into the valves due to the increased stroke.

  3. #23
    Senior User mowgli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    somewhere in the 80's, hinckley
    Posts
    35,194
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Novasport
    I think the machining is more to do with piston to valve clearance to prvent the pistons smashing into the valves due to the increased stroke.
    no, the valve cutouts are pretty much the same on the 1.2 & 1.3. I just couldn't see the point in running a road car on more than 10:1cr & I did 50 odd thousand miles with no troubles, then I got offered a gte engine & couldn't resist sticking it in, so I sold the lump to a bloke for his astra van..

  4. #24
    Senior User matt_vaughan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Bradford, UK
    Posts
    2,392
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    An issue number would be good to find out for this CCC feature cause I will probably have it. Dad used to buy them all the time, and we have a massive pile of em. I also remember reading about it when flicking through some old CCCs sometime a while ago. I could get it scanned at dad's work for everyone.

  5. #25
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Hull, drives: The Wife's Celica, Fixes: Mates cars, Saves: for A16VTB
    Posts
    11,720
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dirtydog1
    would it not be more benificial to keep the higher compression?
    it seems like you guys know what your talking about though.
    ive just bult a 1.6se block with a 1.4se head on, the compression is immense, goes well with carbs on though!
    is this right? and if so what about the 1.2 head on the 1.6?

  6. #26
    Senior User Welsh Dan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Sunny Wrexham Drives: Derv barge
    Posts
    5,467
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by John H
    So i use the 1.2st block, 1.3 pistons rods and crank, 1.2 head? Sounds tempting!
    Shouldnt that read the 12ST block and pistons, 1.3 crank and rods?

  7. #27
    User
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    593
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by slothsport1
    is this right? and if so what about the 1.2 head on the 1.6?
    yes all small block stuff is inter-changeable (i love it)
    no idea what would happen if you put 1.2 on 1.6, the compression on mine is mental as it is. lots of people use 14nz block with the 1.3 sr heads for a twin 40 set up.
    that 1.3 piston in a 1.2 block set up sounds intresting though!

  8. #28
    Senior User Club Member Novasport's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Derby, Derbyshire. Drives: Nova Sport, BMW M3, Nova Swing, Peugeot 208
    Posts
    9,086
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I am wondering what a 1.2 crank in a 1.6 would be like, it would be a proper buzzy little engine. Destroked 1600 prob down to about 1400 CC maybe, over square is it called?

  9. #29
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Hull, drives: The Wife's Celica, Fixes: Mates cars, Saves: for A16VTB
    Posts
    11,720
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    i heard that a 1.2 on a 1.6 gives a 13.7 to 1 cr, now on e85 ethanol, and megasquirt, well.... i reckon it will de stroke it and make it very revvy

  10. #30
    Senior User matt_vaughan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Bradford, UK
    Posts
    2,392
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Novasport
    I am wondering what a 1.2 crank in a 1.6 would be like, it would be a proper buzzy little engine. Destroked 1600 prob down to about 1400 CC maybe, over square is it called?
    Yer, would rev nicely, but Im sure you'd end up with cam and fueling problems without mucking around. Perhaps a 285 cam might fix things?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •