Who said 911's "don't handle"?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BRoadGhost

Well anywho I can't vouch for those who don't understand the layout of such a car & don't have the willingness to learn how to drive it.

The AC Cobra was known as a widow maker too and the engine was in the front. Why was it so dangerous? Because it's lightweight, RWD, but moreover the torque would be the root cause imo; the generic rich guy that bought one hasn't got a clue about how such loadings build up.

---

would have thought more people have died in evos and scoobys then 911's and cobra's but there meant to be some of the best handling cars about, 99% of car crashes do i dare say are from people driving beyond there ability's, be it in bad weather conditions or other wise

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by krobinson

The 911 Turbo is 4WD and actually not too bad. It's the GT2 is the "widow maker", as its 450bhp and RWD (996 form) and 500bhp+ rwd in 997 form. EPIC!!

---

Every days a school day so they say.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by davidfox280585

this is better http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvZtFUJHFV0

---

I want I want I want lol

Next project hmmmm

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BRoadGhost

Well anywho I can't vouch for those who don't understand the layout of such a car & don't have the willingness to learn how to drive it.

The AC Cobra was known as a widow maker too and the engine was in the front. Why was it so dangerous? Because it's lightweight, RWD, but moreover the torque would be the root cause imo; the generic rich guy that bought one hasn't got a clue about how such loadings build up.

---

the cobra also had basically a prewar ladder chassis, and tyres in the early 60's were awful compared to the modern stuff...

there is a story about jim clark winning 4 f1 races with one set of tyres, the wear rates & grip were that bad, and most cars suffered high speed lift.